IMPACT / CONTRIBUTION / LEARNING

Value we can explain.
Change we can test.

Make LGBTQIA+ visitor needs visible in the evidence, and distinguish intended benefits from observed results.

MEASURING VALUE / FIVE DOMAINS

What changes for visitors, businesses, culture and the city?

An impact architecture for the LGBTQIA+ visitor-economy pilot. These are intended outcomes and candidate measures, not results already achieved.

  1. Baseline
  2. Intervention
  3. Use
  4. Outcome
  5. Contribution
  6. Learning

VISITOR

LGBTQIA+ visitor findability, usability, safety, trust and experience

CANDIDATE MEASURE

Task completion and voluntary experience feedback

Pilot Baseline / TBD

BUSINESS

Service readiness, market capability and buyer access

CANDIDATE MEASURE

Verified service changes and qualified buyer conversations

Pilot Baseline / TBD

CITY

Evidence for accessibility, public realm, service nodes and district improvement

CANDIDATE MEASURE

Documented barriers, referrals and decisions informed

Pilot Baseline / TBD

CULTURE & COMMUNITY

Queer cultural capital, local identity, participation and cultural businesses

CANDIDATE MEASURE

Community-validated assets, participation and paid cultural work

Pilot Baseline / TBD

ECONOMY

Visitor spending, jobs, business opportunities, market access and local value

CANDIDATE MEASURE

Verified transactions and local income; no automatic attribution

Pilot Baseline / TBD

Agree the unit, sample, baseline date, evidence owner and review period before testing. Record change after use, examine other influences, distinguish the pilot’s contribution from total market change, and feed the learning back into service and district decisions.

SME JOURNEY / OUTCOME-BASED EVALUATION

Beyond participation: did the SME apply the support?

Activity outputs
Training attendance, certificates, matching events and programme participation
Business outcomes to track
Support applied → stronger capability → market access → transactions, revenue, productivity or other relevant business outcomes

Track the same SME from diagnosis and referral to use and follow-up. Agree a baseline, measure, evidence owner and review date; record other influences before estimating the pilot’s contribution. Success is not measured only by participation.

TDRI × OSMEP / Research and evaluation reference →
Fieldwork and work in progress

INCLUSIVE DATA & EVIDENCE

Evidence for better LGBTQIA+ visitor experiences—not an LGBT database

Start with the decision a city or business needs to make, then collect only the evidence necessary for it.

01

Visitor Demand & Movement

Purpose, journey tasks and aggregate movement patterns

02

Places & Services

Service information, location, hours and contact accuracy

03

Physical and Service Readiness

Observed barriers and tested service improvements

04

LGBTQIA+ Lived Experience / Visitor Feedback

Voluntary feedback with safe aggregation and withdrawal routes

05

Cultural Capital

Queer cultural assets, community interpretation and reuse permissions

06

Outcomes & Impact

Baseline, change, contribution and learning with evidence limits

EVIDENCE / DECISION SUPPORT

Inclusive City Link™

An applied LGBTQIA+ visitor-economy evidence layer for district and service decisions. It can complement wider tourism and city intelligence; it is not a competing national tourism data platform. The integration and data-sharing arrangements remain proposed.

View project and development status

DISCOVERY / SERVICE NAVIGATION

QueerHere / visit.bkk.lgbt

The visitor-facing layer: discover places, navigate services and reach relevant offers. Its role in this model is direct visitor access; a discovery listing does not certify LGBTQIA+ readiness, and a live connection to Inclusive City Link™ is not asserted.

See the shared infrastructure model

2026 UPDATE / WORKING PRIDE ECONOMY APPLICATION

From an LGBTQIA+ visitor journey to a city-service prototype

Use city digital infrastructure, digital public services, City Data Platform, SaaS / cloud adoption and digital solution matching as implementation lenses. Relevant Smart City domains are Smart Mobility, Smart Living, Smart Economy and Smart Governance.

  1. LGBTQIA+ visitor journey
  2. City / service gap
  3. Inclusive City Link™
  4. Digital / spatial prototype
  5. City service use
  6. Evidence
  7. Impact

What to observe
Observe whether a prototype improves actual service use and informs a local-government decision. Record the service owner, accessibility, operating cost, data safeguards and measured change; a technology installation alone is not impact.

Status and scope

Inclusive City Link™ is an applied LGBTQIA+ visitor-economy use case and evidence layer. It is not an official depa Smart City or City Data Platform product; recognition, collaboration, catalogue qualification and integration are not confirmed.

Responsible data: purpose, permission and access

Do not infer sexual orientation or gender identity from a visit, photograph or transaction. Separate contact details from research responses, use voluntary participation and purpose-specific consent where required, and define access, retention and safe reporting before collection. Avoid public person-level movement trails and re-identifying small groups. Each research activity needs its own reviewed protocol; the newsletter notice is not research consent.